Медведев вышел в финал турнира в Дубае17:59
“预制菜”在今年深入人心，也成了等菜期间的话题。一锅浓汤鸡煲翅，软烂脱骨的整鸡当是提前熬煮；本地特产“土笋冻”，制作工序繁琐，需去除土笋内脏、反复清洗，熬煮至胶质析出，再分装冷却，待其凝固，自是无法现点现做。
，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026
OpenAI周五发布的声明称，亚马逊、英伟达和软银在该轮融资中分别投资了500亿美元、300亿美元和300亿美元。这笔投资使OpenAI的估值达到7300亿美元(未计入投资前)，相较于其10月份在二级融资中的5000亿美元估值，实现了大幅增长。OpenAI表示，随着本轮融资的推进，预计其他投资者也将加入。（证券时报）
ВСУ запустили «Фламинго» вглубь России. В Москве заявили, что это британские ракеты с украинскими шильдиками16:45。雷电模拟器官方版本下载对此有专业解读
│ visibility │ syscall │ separate │ hardware │ no kernel。safew官方版本下载对此有专业解读
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.